Categories: News

Opponents Of Trump's Travel Ban Make Their Case To Federal Appeals Court

[ad_1]

Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, center, speaks to the media next to Washington state solicitor general Noah Purcell, right, outside the U.S. federal courthouse in downtown Seattle February 3, 2017.

Staff / Reuters

WASHINGTON — In overnight filings, the states of Washington and Minnesota, joined by Hawaii, technology companies, former senior foreign policy officials, and civil rights groups laid out the legal case against President Trump's refugee and travel ban executive order.

The filings came in opposition to the Justice Department's request that a Feb. 3 district court order halting enforcement of the executive order be stayed — or put on hold — so the government could restart enforcement of the ban while the case is appealed.

US District Judge James Robart issued a temporary restraining order on Feb. 3, halting enforcement of key provisions of the Jan. 27 executive order: the ban on travel to the US from seven majority-Muslim countries and the halt to the refugee program.

“The effects of the TRO were positive and immediate, as immigration procedures began to return to normal, families reunited, stranded students and faculty began returning to our States, and longtime State residents were able to return to their homes,” Washington and Minnesota lawyers wrote. “Defendants now ask this Court to unleash chaos again by staying the district court order. The Court should decline.”

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit denied the Justice Department's request for an immediate stay of Robart's order on Feb. 4, but set a briefing schedule for the request for a stay pending appeal. Opponents of the executive order had filings due by 1 a.m. Pacific Time Monday, while the Justice Department's reply is due by 3 p.m. Pacific Time Monday.

The Ninth Circuit did not set a time for when it will issue a decision on whether to grant the stay.

This is a developing story. Please check back at BuzzFeed News for more.

Read Washington and Minnesota’s opposition:

Read the filing from technology companies and other businesses:

Read Hawaii’s motion to intervene:

Read Hawaii’s opposition:

LINK: Read the Korematsu Institute’s filing.

LINK: Read the ACLU’s filing.

LINK: Read Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Southern Poverty Law Center’s filing.

LINK: Read the filing from HIAS, Inc., nonprofit refugee protection organization.

RELATED:

LINK: Top Former US Officials Have Told A Court Trump’s Travel Ban Makes America Less Safe

[ad_2]

techfeatured

Recent Posts

Trending Innovations in Auto Repair: How Modern Technology Shapes Service Quality

Table of Contents: Key Takeaways Understanding the Impact of Diagnostic Software Electric and Hybrid Vehicles:…

4 days ago

Exploring the Impact of Trigger Kits on Firearm Performance and Safety

Key Takeaways: Custom trigger kits can offer personalization while potentially improving shooting accuracy and performance.…

2 weeks ago

Extending Vehicle Longevity: The Impact of Ceramic Coatings on Car Maintenance

Ensuring a vehicle's longevity requires more than just regular servicing; it encompasses a broader approach…

2 weeks ago

Better Care with Tech: How Skilled Use of Medical Tools Saves Lives

Technological developments in medicine have raised the bar for patient care to an unprecedented degree,…

1 month ago

Choosing the Right Platform: Options for Website Creation

In the digital era, having a website is essential for businesses, organizations, and individuals alike.…

1 month ago

7 Features of E-bikes That Make Them Worth the Purchase

In the evolving landscape of urban mobility, electric bikes (e-bikes) have carved out a significant…

2 months ago