[ad_1]
They call the product “completely worthless.”
St. Ives Apricot Scrub has been a cult favorite since the ’90s.
It has won Allure Readers' Choice Awards almost every year for over a decade, was extolled by Gigi Hadid, and garnered thousands of adoring reviews wherever skin care products are sold.
As Slate reported, the product has become the subject of great outrage on the subreddit /r/SkincareAddiction, where many people say it's “too harsh” and has “ruined” their skin.
Some have called it the “Devil Scrub” that is “on par with uttering Voldermort's name.”
Plaintiffs Kaylee Browning and Sarah Basile cited multiple dermatologists in their lawsuit, one of whom claimed the scrub causes “micro-tears” in the skin that make it “more vulnerable to environmental damages, pollution, and sun damage.”
They say “they never would have bought St. Ives facial scrub if the defendant had disclosed that it causes skin damage.”
Browning and Basile also take issue with the product's claims of being “non-comedogenic,” meaning it does not clog pores.
They are also challenging advertising claims that it is “dermatologist tested” since “it is not actually recommended by dermatologists.”
“Accordingly, St. Ives is unfit to be sold or used as a facial scrub,” the plaintiffs claim in the suit. “The product is completely worthless.”
[ad_2]
Key Takeaways Ceramic coatings offer superior protection but require proper maintenance to keep them effective.…
Table of Contents: Introduction to Modern Electrical Contracting Innovations Transforming the Industry Best Practices for…
Key Takeaways Understand the importance of document shredding for data protection. Explore cost-effective and compliant…
Key Takeaways Basement waterproofing involves multiple strategies for long-term success. Proper drainage and sealing are…
Table of Contents Understanding the Basics of Food Display Latest Trends in Food Display Solutions…
Key Takeaways Technology is rapidly transforming the healthcare industry. Benefits include improved patient outcomes, increased…