[ad_1]
They call the product “completely worthless.”
St. Ives Apricot Scrub has been a cult favorite since the ’90s.
It has won Allure Readers' Choice Awards almost every year for over decade, was extolled by Gigi Hadid, and garnered thousands of adoring reviews wherever skin care products are sold.
As Slate reported, the product has become the subject of great outrage on the subreddit /r/SkincareAddiction, where many people say it's “too harsh” and has “ruined” their skin.
Some have called it the “Devil Scrub” that is “on par with uttering Voldermort's name.”
Plaintiffs Kaylee Browning and Sarah Basile cited multiple dermatologists in their lawsuit, one of whom claimed the scrub causes “micro-tears” in the skin that make it “more vulnerable to environmental damages, pollution, and sun damage.”
They say “they never would have bought St. Ives facial scrub if the defendant had disclosed that it causes skin damage.”
Browning and Basile also take issue with the product's claims of being “non-comedogenic,” meaning it does not clog pores.
They are also challenging advertising claims that it is “dermatologist tested” since “it is not actually recommended by dermatologists.”
“Accordingly, St. Ives is unfit to be sold or used as a facial scrub,” the plaintiffs claim in the suit. “The product is completely worthless.”
[ad_2]
Table of Contents Introduction to IT Managed Service Providers Why Outsource IT Management? Cost-Effective Solutions…
Key Takeaways: The importance of selecting the correct thresholds for different areas in your home…
Key Takeaways: The variety of railing gate designs can significantly enhance the aesthetic appeal of…
For many, commuting is an unavoidable part of daily life. But when that commute extends…
When you're on the road, you want to feel safe, comfortable, and like you have…
Key Takeaways: Understanding the significance of indoor air quality. Identifying common pollutants in your home.…